rob.mccombe
Ok guys im looking at getting some timecode vinyls to finish of my set up but i have noticed there is 3 different kinds to choose from.
Could someone please show me the way as i dont no which ones to choose.
1. Serato scratch live (black)
2. Serato scratch rane live (red)
3. Serato scratch rane live (blue)
Could i buy 1 blue and 1 red so that i could have one on either deck to match the colours within vdj.
Thanks
Could someone please show me the way as i dont no which ones to choose.
1. Serato scratch live (black)
2. Serato scratch rane live (red)
3. Serato scratch rane live (blue)
Could i buy 1 blue and 1 red so that i could have one on either deck to match the colours within vdj.
Thanks
Mensajes Sat 22 Aug 09 @ 9:30 pm
DJRudeDoGG
Don't quote me on this but I don't think it matters which one you use. Can anyone corroborate this?
Mensajes Sun 23 Aug 09 @ 12:02 am
jimmy b
It doesn't matter what colour vinyl you buy, just as long you buy the 2nd gen (CV02) vinyl's you will be just fine.
Mensajes Sun 23 Aug 09 @ 3:10 am
dizzyrocks2001
I have all three colours and I can confirm that they're all fine.
Mensajes Sun 23 Aug 09 @ 3:03 pm
djles.co.uk
Just ordered A red & a blue, should get them Tuesday.
Will lock myself in a room for the rest of the day with my Technics 1210s and VDJ :-)
Will lock myself in a room for the rest of the day with my Technics 1210s and VDJ :-)
Mensajes Sun 23 Aug 09 @ 10:26 pm
dizzyrocks2001
For the record (pun intended), the Serato timecodes are way better than the VirtualVinyl timecodes. I had the following problems with VV timecodes:
-fluctuating timecode % signal quality (I spent so much time checking cables, needles and settings within VV thinking it was everything BUT the timecodes).
-I had 6 VV timecodes and all of them were ever so slightly warped (convex). For example, when you used them with the red label facing up they were ok, but when you used them with the blue label facing up they were way too 'slippy' so when you released the record it wouldn't catch on the slipmat properly and it would take a half a second to get going.
-They had to be specially ordered and were more expensive (you can by Serato timecodes everywhere).
-I don't know if it was just my imagination but they seemed to collect dust more quickly. It seemed like I was having to brush a big ball of lint off the needles and clean the vinyls more often than with the Serato timecodes.
-Backspins with VV timecodes were not smooth. The song would stutter when doing a backspin.
-Scratching with Serato timecodes is much more accurate (less sticker drift).
-Overall playback is more reliable. I was finding with VV timecodes I would often get little hiccups here and there when playing a track so most of the time I would have to switch over to 'internal' mode after starting a track. Now that I'm using Serato timecodes I feel confident to leave VV in vinyl mode.
-Serato timecodes come in different colours!
All of that said, I give kudos to Atomix for implementing the ability to use a competitor's timecodes because now I have the option to use better quality timecodes and all of the problems listed above have been pretty much eliminated. The end result is I can spend less time worrying about little quirks and more time concentrating on the music. The one thing I miss though is that the graphic on the VV timecode label matched the roatating LED display on my TTXs and the virtual jog wheel on my VV skin :(
-fluctuating timecode % signal quality (I spent so much time checking cables, needles and settings within VV thinking it was everything BUT the timecodes).
-I had 6 VV timecodes and all of them were ever so slightly warped (convex). For example, when you used them with the red label facing up they were ok, but when you used them with the blue label facing up they were way too 'slippy' so when you released the record it wouldn't catch on the slipmat properly and it would take a half a second to get going.
-They had to be specially ordered and were more expensive (you can by Serato timecodes everywhere).
-I don't know if it was just my imagination but they seemed to collect dust more quickly. It seemed like I was having to brush a big ball of lint off the needles and clean the vinyls more often than with the Serato timecodes.
-Backspins with VV timecodes were not smooth. The song would stutter when doing a backspin.
-Scratching with Serato timecodes is much more accurate (less sticker drift).
-Overall playback is more reliable. I was finding with VV timecodes I would often get little hiccups here and there when playing a track so most of the time I would have to switch over to 'internal' mode after starting a track. Now that I'm using Serato timecodes I feel confident to leave VV in vinyl mode.
-Serato timecodes come in different colours!
All of that said, I give kudos to Atomix for implementing the ability to use a competitor's timecodes because now I have the option to use better quality timecodes and all of the problems listed above have been pretty much eliminated. The end result is I can spend less time worrying about little quirks and more time concentrating on the music. The one thing I miss though is that the graphic on the VV timecode label matched the roatating LED display on my TTXs and the virtual jog wheel on my VV skin :(
Mensajes Mon 24 Aug 09 @ 10:04 am
djles.co.uk
DJSoulman wrote :
Just ordered A red & a blue, should get them Tuesday.
Will lock myself in a room for the rest of the day with my Technics 1210s and VDJ :-)
Will lock myself in a room for the rest of the day with my Technics 1210s and VDJ :-)
Unfortunately, the coloured ones are out of stock, so getting the black ones. Oh well..........
Mensajes Mon 24 Aug 09 @ 1:18 pm
dj rozqui
actuallly there are no problem what ever color of timecoded vynil for serato you want to use! it all works the same and only the difference is the color. but you should buy the second edition one and not the first edition since it have playlist scrolling!
Ok guys im looking at getting some timecode vinyls to finish of my set up but i have noticed there is 3 different kinds to choose from.
Could someone please show me the way as i dont no which ones to choose.
1. Serato scratch live (black)
2. Serato scratch rane live (red)
3. Serato scratch rane live (blue)
Could i buy 1 blue and 1 red so that i could have one on either deck to match the colours within vdj.
Thanks
Ok guys im looking at getting some timecode vinyls to finish of my set up but i have noticed there is 3 different kinds to choose from.
Could someone please show me the way as i dont no which ones to choose.
1. Serato scratch live (black)
2. Serato scratch rane live (red)
3. Serato scratch rane live (blue)
Could i buy 1 blue and 1 red so that i could have one on either deck to match the colours within vdj.
Thanks
Mensajes Mon 24 Aug 09 @ 9:49 pm
dj rozqui
i have a serato time coded vinyl also and i really like the accuracy of serato's control vinyl! i like scratching and forever i will be a turntablist same as you! and as you said i would like to thank atomix for allowing other timecoded hardwares to be used on their software. thats why i like all the people here in vdj because they are open for all
For the record (pun intended), the Serato timecodes are way better than the VirtualVinyl timecodes. I had the following problems with VV timecodes:
-fluctuating timecode % signal quality (I spent so much time checking cables, needles and settings within VV thinking it was everything BUT the timecodes).
-I had 6 VV timecodes and all of them were ever so slightly warped (convex). For example, when you used them with the red label facing up they were ok, but when you used them with the blue label facing up they were way too 'slippy' so when you released the record it wouldn't catch on the slipmat properly and it would take a half a second to get going.
-They had to be specially ordered and were more expensive (you can by Serato timecodes everywhere).
-I don't know if it was just my imagination but they seemed to collect dust more quickly. It seemed like I was having to brush a big ball of lint off the needles and clean the vinyls more often than with the Serato timecodes.
-Backspins with VV timecodes were not smooth. The song would stutter when doing a backspin.
-Scratching with Serato timecodes is much more accurate (less sticker drift).
-Overall playback is more reliable. I was finding with VV timecodes I would often get little hiccups here and there when playing a track so most of the time I would have to switch over to 'internal' mode after starting a track. Now that I'm using Serato timecodes I feel confident to leave VV in vinyl mode.
-Serato timecodes come in different colours!
All of that said, I give kudos to Atomix for implementing the ability to use a competitor's timecodes because now I have the option to use better quality timecodes and all of the problems listed above have been pretty much eliminated. The end result is I can spend less time worrying about little quirks and more time concentrating on the music. The one thing I miss though is that the graphic on the VV timecode label matched the roatating LED display on my TTXs and the virtual jog wheel on my VV skin :(
For the record (pun intended), the Serato timecodes are way better than the VirtualVinyl timecodes. I had the following problems with VV timecodes:
-fluctuating timecode % signal quality (I spent so much time checking cables, needles and settings within VV thinking it was everything BUT the timecodes).
-I had 6 VV timecodes and all of them were ever so slightly warped (convex). For example, when you used them with the red label facing up they were ok, but when you used them with the blue label facing up they were way too 'slippy' so when you released the record it wouldn't catch on the slipmat properly and it would take a half a second to get going.
-They had to be specially ordered and were more expensive (you can by Serato timecodes everywhere).
-I don't know if it was just my imagination but they seemed to collect dust more quickly. It seemed like I was having to brush a big ball of lint off the needles and clean the vinyls more often than with the Serato timecodes.
-Backspins with VV timecodes were not smooth. The song would stutter when doing a backspin.
-Scratching with Serato timecodes is much more accurate (less sticker drift).
-Overall playback is more reliable. I was finding with VV timecodes I would often get little hiccups here and there when playing a track so most of the time I would have to switch over to 'internal' mode after starting a track. Now that I'm using Serato timecodes I feel confident to leave VV in vinyl mode.
-Serato timecodes come in different colours!
All of that said, I give kudos to Atomix for implementing the ability to use a competitor's timecodes because now I have the option to use better quality timecodes and all of the problems listed above have been pretty much eliminated. The end result is I can spend less time worrying about little quirks and more time concentrating on the music. The one thing I miss though is that the graphic on the VV timecode label matched the roatating LED display on my TTXs and the virtual jog wheel on my VV skin :(
Mensajes Mon 24 Aug 09 @ 10:08 pm
ghettotech
to dizzyrocks2001.. less drift?
do u mean no drift or less..
is it possible to be a virtualdj turntablist... without vinyl slipping?
do u mean no drift or less..
is it possible to be a virtualdj turntablist... without vinyl slipping?
Mensajes Tue 27 Oct 09 @ 8:14 pm
listen2
Just to let users know, there are newer version of Serato TCV. The newer ones are more transparent and thinner.
Mensajes Wed 28 Oct 09 @ 8:57 am
cioce
jimmy b wrote :
It doesn't matter what colour vinyl you buy, just as long you buy the 2nd gen (CV02) vinyl's you will be just fine.
I can confirm this, I have two Serato CV02 vinyls and it work good with Hercules Trim 4&6.
Mensajes Wed 28 Oct 09 @ 10:52 am
jamescg
do i burn timecde cd as an mp3 or as a regular audio cd
Mensajes Thu 29 Oct 09 @ 9:05 am
cioce
regular audio cd
Mensajes Thu 29 Oct 09 @ 9:49 am
radiofc
Sorry for posting on an old topic but can some of you please indicate what settings you have specified (with screenshots if possible) for timecodes including debug info and performance settings and ASIO settings in order to get VDJ working with the CV02 records? I receive a 100% signal (with slight fluctuations) and can track the mp3 quite well as it plays but I notice that halfway through a song the pitch slider in the software starts gradually increasing - what can be the cause of this? Thanks for your help..
Mensajes Thu 03 Nov 11 @ 2:41 pm
the SOUND INSURGENT
Here you go as promised, http://www.virtualdj.com/forums/146709/General_Discussion/Perfect_Timecodes__.html?page=1
I also posted a link in the last thread for you aswell......
Honestly I've never seen anyone post there setting even though they all say their setup works great.........
Good luck
Huey
I also posted a link in the last thread for you aswell......
Honestly I've never seen anyone post there setting even though they all say their setup works great.........
Good luck
Huey
Mensajes Thu 03 Nov 11 @ 2:54 pm
radiofc
Thanks again Huey - I thought you were championing the Numarks over the CV02s in another discussion but how and ever I'll try again to see if I can make them work.. Cheers.
Mensajes Thu 03 Nov 11 @ 3:48 pm
the SOUND INSURGENT
And I still say the Numarks track better, lol, but I posted my settings for perfect working Serato vinyl since everyone here uses them.
Enjoy and holla at me in the other thread if you need anything
Huey
Enjoy and holla at me in the other thread if you need anything
Huey
Mensajes Thu 03 Nov 11 @ 4:20 pm
AudioDelite
Mensajes Tue 15 Nov 11 @ 7:35 pm