Ingreso rápido:  

Forum: General Discussion

Tema: Intel Core 2 = AMDead - Page: 4

Este tópico es antiguo y puede contener información incorrecta para la nueva versión.

guys guys guys :) In a coupple of years nobody will be using Intel Or AMD. The CPu´s will be made out of bakterias and other crazy stuff..just kidding :) Interesting though would be if AMD removes their pins of CPU and make a platform similiar to 775..anyways..just water cool and fx62 and overclock and u got ya self a core 2 duo :P kidding :P intel and amd should team up :)
 

Mensajes Fri 20 Oct 06 @ 3:38 pm
sbangsPRO InfinityMember since 2004
would be nice :)

quad core soon :)
 

Mensajes Fri 20 Oct 06 @ 4:06 pm
DJ CyderPRO InfinityModeratorMember since 2003
looking for octi-core shoudl be better eh....
 

Mensajes Fri 20 Oct 06 @ 4:12 pm
octi core would be nice :) ahh...the pleasures of multitasking :D
 

Mensajes Sat 21 Oct 06 @ 1:32 pm
:::yawns::: What a waste of 1 hour! haha....j/k! This thread tought me a lot though. Everyone has a right to an opinion, and everyone should respect other people's opinions. I have a core 2 duo 2.0ghz dell e1705 and virtual doesn't seem to go past the 50% mark for cpu usage....and neither does any other program it seems. I'm still not sold on the whole multi-thread idea. I'm beginning to believe that a program will NOT use the feature unless it is written to use multi-threading. Only difference is that for now, other apps in the background can run, without lagging while vdj analyzes a file. Or while Windows does a Defender scan, the other 1/2 of the cpu is available for other programs....but they still don't run any faster, they just don't lag. Am I right?

Jason G
 

Mensajes Mon 30 Oct 06 @ 10:08 am


(Los tópicos y foros antiguos son automáticamente cerrados)